PageSpeed or Lighthouse score in the red
A low score is a symptom, not the diagnosis. I look at what is actually blocking render, not just the number, before touching anything.
Real performance work on images, caching, plugins and the code path Google actually measures, not a plugin installed and left on default settings. You get a before and after Core Web Vitals report.
Real performance work on images, caching, plugins and the code path Google actually measures, not a plugin installed and left on default settings. You get a before and after Core Web Vitals report.
Speed problems rarely have one cause. These are the patterns I see most when a WordPress site is genuinely slow, not just slow in one test.
A low score is a symptom, not the diagnosis. I look at what is actually blocking render, not just the number, before touching anything.
Google is measuring real visitors, not a lab test, which means the fix has to hold under real network conditions and real devices, not just a synthetic test run.
Most traffic and most of Google’s ranking signal is mobile. A site that looks fine on a fibre connection at a desk can fail badly on a phone on 4G.
Page builders, form plugins and analytics scripts stack up over time. I audit what is actually earning its place on the page and remove or replace what is not.
Lighthouse, PageSpeed Insights and Search Console data get pulled together first, so we are optimizing against your actual numbers, not a guess.
Images, unoptimized plugins, render-blocking scripts and slow queries are identified individually rather than treated as one vague problem.
Changes that move the score the most happen first, tested on staging so nothing breaks on the way to being fast.
Pushed live, then re-tested under the same conditions as the baseline, so the improvement is measured, not assumed.
A short report on what changed, what to avoid adding back, and what would slow it down again if ignored.
Profiling and speeding up WordPress sites has been a recurring part of eleven years in web development, across lightweight custom themes and heavier Elementor and Divi builds alike — enough to tell you honestly what is achievable for a specific setup rather than promising 100 across the board.
It depends on the site, but a well-optimized WordPress site with images and content can reasonably reach the high 80s to high 90s on mobile. I will tell you honestly what is achievable for your specific setup rather than promising 100 across the board.
For a full optimization, yes, since caching and server-level configuration matter as much as the WordPress side. If hosting access is not possible, I can still do the on-site work and tell you what hosting is holding back.
No, and I would not trust anyone who does, since scores vary by test conditions. What I do guarantee is a measurable improvement against your baseline, with the report to show it.
Yes, with the right configuration, though it takes more careful work than a lightweight custom theme. I have optimized both, and will tell you upfront if the builder itself is the ceiling on how fast the site can get.
A typical site takes a few days from audit to final report. Sites with deeper database or hosting issues can take longer, and I will scope that honestly after the initial audit.
The initial fix is a fixed-price, one-time engagement, scoped after the baseline audit. Performance drifts as plugins update and content gets added, so some clients bring me back periodically or add it to an ongoing maintenance arrangement.
Available for new projects
NEXT STEP
Based in Dhaka, Bangladesh, working with clients worldwide. Describe the project and where it is stuck — every serious enquiry gets a reply within one working day.
ALSO WORTH READING